SpacePolicyOnline.com Latest News

Russia's RIA Novosti is quoting Russian space officials as saying that the docking of Progress M-19M will proceed on schedule tomorrow morning Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) even though its navigation antenna did not deploy.

The robotic cargo spacecraft was launched yesterday from the Baikonur Cosmodrome.  Once on orbit, one of the antennas for its KURS navigation system used to bring it in for docking with the International Space Station (ISS) failed to deploy, however.  The spacecraft is continuing on its 2-day rendezvous course to meet up with ISS tomorrow morning, Friday, April 26.   The nominal schedule calls for docking at 8:26 am EDT.  NASA TV will provide live coverage beginning at 6:30 am EDT.

RIA Novosti reported that ground controllers will continue to try to get the antenna to deploy, but quoted a spokesman for the Russian space enterprise Energia as saying "Even if we fail, the problem with the antenna should not hamper the docking."  The ISS crew will be instructed to conduct a manual docking instead of an automated docking if the antenna remains undeployed.

In an abbreviated hearing on NASA's FY2014 budget request this morning, Senate appropriators ploughed little new ground, but one message that came through loud and clear is that if the sequester continues past the current fiscal year "all bets are off" in terms of what will happen to NASA.

That is the phrase used by NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden today as well as at yesterday's hearing on the House side.  Today he went into slightly more detail about the potential consequences at the request of Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD).   Mikulski chairs the full Senate Appropriations Committee as well as the Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS) subcommittee that took testimony from Bolden today.  Mikulski was late to the 9:30 am ET hearing, apologizing that it took her two hours to get to Capitol Hill from her home in Baltimore this morning.  She joked that she needed one of Bolden's rockets.   She thanked committee vice-chairman Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) for starting the hearing without her and said it was a sign of the committee's bipartisanship.   The hearing was limited in its duration because a special briefing for Senators was scheduled for 10:30 on North Korea and Syria, Mikulski explained.  NASA Inspector General Paul Martin was scheduled to testify, but his statement was submitted for the record instead.

Mikulski, Shelby, and Sen. Thad Cochran (R-MS) were the only Senators present and the questions fell along familiar lines.  Shelby made clear that he wants NASA to spend money on the Space Launch System (SLS), which is being built at Marshall Space Flight Center in his state, and not the commercial crew program.   Cochran wanted to ensure that the interests of Stennis Space Center in his state were represented.  Mikulski wanted assurances that the James Webb Space Telescope, being built at Goddard Space Flight Center in her state, remains on cost and schedule.   She brought up last week's GAO report that says the telescope is overweight and two instruments will be 11 months late.  Bolden was surprised by a similar question at yesterday's House hearing, but was ready today.  He referenced the 14 month schedule reserve that the program has and said instrument delivery was adjusted to compensate for the 11- month slip and the project overall remains on cost and schedule for launch in 2018. 

Mikulski pressed Bolden on what will happen if the sequester remains in place as it will under current law.  Although attention has been focused on the impact of the sequester on FY2013, under the 2011 Budget Control Act, it actually remains in place through FY2021.  The Administration's budget requests for NASA and other departments and agencies assume that agreement will be reached to replace the sequester with another method of deficit reduction. 

If it remains in place, however, Bolden said that NASA's budget would drop from its $16.8 billion sequestered level for FY2013 to $16.2 billion.  Such a cut would impact JWST and  SLS/Orion and "devastate" commercial cargo and commercial crew, he said.  He added that he also would have to furlough civil servants when the FY2014 budget becomes effective.  NASA was funded at $17.8 billion in FY2012 and the request for FY2014 is $17.7 billion.  

Shelby has not been shy about expressing his lack of enthusiasm for the commercial crew program, today calling privately funded vehicles a "fiction" that diverts funding from NASA developing human spaceflight capabilities with SLS.  Asserting that he is a long time supporter of public-private partnerships to leverage private resource, but in this case, he said, NASA is giving the companies $1.5 billion without knowing how much the companies themselves are investing.   He objects to the use of Space Act Agreements (SAAs) instead of traditional contracts under Federal Acquisition Regulations (FARs).  Bolden said that the amount of money the companies are investing is competition-sensitive proprietary information and that the SAAs provide "satisfactory insight and oversight." 

Bolden repeated what he said yesterday that if the agency does not receive the full $822 million request for commercial crew in FY2014, "it will be my unfortunate duty" to tell Congress and the White House that the United States probably will not be able to launch astronauts by 2017.  He added that he will need to ask for new authority to contract with the Russians for additional launches.  It is "not my desire" to come back and ask for more money to pay the Russians, he stressed.

No questions were asked about NASA's new asteroid retrieval strategy.  In his opening statement, Shelby said he was concerned that the budget request is an example of "chasing the next great idea while sacrificing current investments," but did not mention the asteroid mission specifically.

A webcast of the hearing is available on the committee's website.

Russia launched the Progress M-19M cargo spacecraft to the International Space Station (ISS) today, April 24, but a navigational antenna failed to deploy once it reached orbit. 

The robotic spacecraft is on a two-day rendezvous course to the ISS and ground controllers are continuing to try to resolve the problem.  It is carrying 2.5 tons of cargo for the ISS crew.

Russia's RIA Novosti quotes a Russian mission control spokesman as saying that "We have failed so far to deploy the antenna (after two attempts), but we consider this a secondary issue at this point."  The antenna is part of the Kurs navigation system that guides the spacecraft to its docking port.

The only word from NASA appears to be a tweet this morning that said:  "Update: Once in orbit, an antenna used as a navigational aid on the Progress did not deploy. Russian ground controllers are assessing a fix." 

Members of a House subcommittee expressed concern on a bipartisan basis today about NASA's new asteroid retrieval mission as well as whether NASA will get the resources needed to fund responsibilities transferred from other agencies if the FY2014 budget request is approved.

The Space Subcommittee of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee heard from NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden about the FY2014 NASA budget request.  Questions focused on four major areas of concern.

• Asteroid Retrieval Strategy.  Several members, including subcommittee chairman Rep. Steve Palazzo (R-MS), full committee chairman Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), and ranking subcommittee Democrat Rep. Donna Edwards (D-MD), expressed concern about  NASA's request for $105 million to move forward on its new asteroid retrieval strategy.  That strategy involves capturing an asteroid, directing it into a lunar orbit, and sending astronauts to retrieve a sample.   
  • One question was how much such a mission would cost.  Bolden reiterated what he and other agency officials have been saying that although they have yet to complete a mission concept study, they think it will be less than the $2.6 billion estimated by the 2012 Keck Institute of Space Studies (KISS) report where the idea originated.  NASA's thinking is that the KISS study did not take into account work ongoing at NASA on the Space Launch System (SLS), the Orion capsule, development of solar electric propulsion (SEP), and searches for Near Earth Objects (NEOs - asteroids and comets).  The KISS study also envisioned retrieving a particular type of asteroid of scientific interest that would take longer to reach than a more generic asteroid NASA hopes to find one that is closer and already on a path towards the Earth-Moon system.  
  • Several Republicans also pressed Bolden on whether sending people to an asteroid or putting them on the lunar surface is better in terms of the ultimate goal of sending astronauts to Mars.  Bolden said neither is better, but the reality is that he does not have the money for a lunar surface mission.  He said that he had been told the cost of the Altair lunar lander planned for the Constellation program under the George W. Bush Administration was $8-10 billion, while the cost for this asteroid mission is $2.6 billion or less. (That estimate is on top of the existing spending on SLS, Orion, SEP, and NEO searches). 
• SLS/Orion versus Commercial Crew.   Several members also questioned why the request for SLS is less than what Congress authorized while funding would increase dramatically (in percentage terms) for commercial crew.  Those questions continue the debate over the uneasy compromise Congress and the Obama Administration reached in the 2010 NASA Authorization Act.   The President wanted to turn human spaceflight to low Earth orbit (LEO) over to the private sector by providing partial funding to companies to develop systems to take astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS).  Congress, however, wanted NASA to develop a new "heavy lift" launch vehicle (SLS) and a spacecraft (Orion) to take astronauts beyond LEO as was planned in the Bush Administration's Constellation program.   The compromise was to do both, a major challenge in a budget-constrained reality.  Some members want NASA to narrow the number of companies it is supporting in the commercial crew program, but NASA wants at least two so there is competition.   Bolden also stressed that SLS is funded in three different parts of NASA's budget so while there may appear to be a reduction, in fact there is not.  NASA is stressing firmly that if it does not get the $821 million requested for commercial crew in  FY2014, the availability of a U.S. space transportation system to launch American astronauts from American soil will not be possible by 2017.  NASA has not been able to launch astronauts since the space shuttle was discontinued in 2011.  It pays Russia to ferry astronauts to the ISS at a price of $63 million each.
• New Responsibilities Without Sufficient New Resources.   The FY2014 budget request proposes transferring climate sensors that were to be funded by NOAA, and responsibility for the facilities that produce plutonium-238 for some of NASA's planetary probes that was to be paid for by the Department of Energy, to NASA.  In addition, NASA would be assigned responsibility for building future Landsat land remote sensing satellites; the Obama Administration had hoped to assign that to the U.S. Geological Survey, which operates the Landsat satellites, but Congress said no.   Small increases are included in the FY2014 request to cover the costs of the climate sensors and Pu-238 production, but whether they will be sustained in future years is the concern.  The budget for NASA's Science Mission Directorate is already stretched thin, especially for planetary science.
• Restructuring of STEM Programs.  Reps. Joe Kennedy III (D-MA) and Frederica Wilson (D-FL) are worried about the White House's proposal to consolidate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education programs from 13 agencies to three (National Science Foundation, Department of Education, and Smithsonian), dramatically reducing NASA's role in these programs.  Bolden defended the move, saying that when he asked his Office of Education staff to provide metrics on the effectiveness of NASA's education programs, they did not have an answer.  The new structure is intended to make the STEM programs more effective in terms of cost and value to the students, he said.

At one point, Smith asked Bolden about new problems in the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) program. Bolden insisted at first that he is briefed on JWST weekly and the program is on track.  Smith then read from a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report released last week that identified 11 month delays in two JWST instruments and other issues.  Bolden clearly was taken by surprise.  GAO says "JWST is currently experiencing technical issues" including the spacecraft being overweight and "two instruments will be delivered at least 11 months late."  NASA officials in other forums have emphasized that the re-baselined program has sufficient schedule and funding reserves to cope with any problems that arise and still maintain the 2018 launch schedule.   It is surprising, however, that Bolden apparently had not been briefed on the GAO report. 

NASA's budget request, like that of the other Executive Branch agencies, assumes that sequestration will be replaced by another method of deficit reduction.  Edwards asked Bolden what will happen if that does not happen and sequestration continues.  Bolden replied: "to be candid, all bets are off" if sequestration remains the law of the land.

NASA’s new asteroid retrieval mission has not won over two influential voices in space policy debates.  Cornell University’s Steve Squyres and George Washington University’s Scott Pace told the National Research Council (NRC) on Monday that it is not necessarily the best next step for the U.S. human spaceflight program.

The NRC’s Committee on Human Spaceflight met Monday and Tuesday in Washington, DC.  The committee is tasked with describing the value proposition of the human spaceflight program – what do taxpayers see as its value for the money spent – and providing advice on future planning for that program.  Among the topics discussed was NASA's new asteroid retrieval strategy to capture an asteroid, redirect it into a retrograde lunar orbit, and send astronauts to retrieve a sample.

Squyres chairs the NASA Advisory Council (NAC) and is perhaps best known as the principal investigator for the twin Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity.  He also chaired the NRC's 2011 Decadal Survey for planetary science.   In addition to talking about NAC’s view of NASA's human exploration program, he shared his personal views on topics NAC had not yet considered, including the new asteroid retrieval strategy.

His personal recommendation is that NASA not attempt to sell the asteroid retrieval mission either on the basis of exploring asteroids or that it is a more effective way to satisfy President Obama’s goal of using an asteroid mission as a step towards Mars.  Quoting the President's April 15, 2010 speech at Kennedy Space Center, Squyres reminded the committee that the President's goal was to build "new spacecraft designed for long journeys ... beyond the Moon into deep space," which is not what the new strategy entails.  He agrees that understanding asteroids is an important scientific goal, but not one that requires humans on-site.   Humans and robots work effectively together in exploring complex environments like Mars where Earth-bound scientists cannot anticipate the many surprises that lie ahead. Comparatively straightforward environments like that of an asteroid can be effectively explored with robotic spacecraft alone, he believes.

Squyres does, however, support the idea of sending astronauts into cis-lunar space for longer periods of time than during the Apollo era, such as the 22-day mission envisioned for the asteroid retrieval mission.   In his view, that is worth doing whether or not an asteroid has been redirected there.  His major concern personally, which he said also has been expressed by NAC, is that "NASA needs a compelling and clearly articulated goal for future human spaceflight that is consistent with its budget."

Pace strongly supported a robust U.S. human spaceflight program, but not the asteroid mission as a step towards Mars.   He said he is “hard pressed to run into anybody who thinks that going to an asteroid is the right way primarily to go to Mars.”  He believes that the Obama Administration made a decision “not to do anything the prior Administration was doing” in space, and that is how the asteroid idea emerged despite broad bipartisan and international support for returning to the Moon as laid out in President George W. Bush’s Vision for Space Exploration.  Pace was a high ranking NASA official in the Bush Administration.

Asked what would happen if the United States abandoned human spaceflight entirely, Pace said it would diminish U.S. influence on the global stage in discussions about space issues such as orbital debris and sustainability.  "We will have made ourselves irrelevant to a lot of discussions," adding that he sees some of that reduced influence already with the U.S. decision to withdraw from cooperation with Europe in the robotic ExoMars missions.   "Countries are not upset at us. They simply think we're irrelevant....I can't think of [anything] that is ... more dangerous or serious for a great power than to be considered irrelevant.”

Lt. Gen. Thomas Stafford (Ret.) told a Senate subcommittee today that a human mission to an asteroid should not be a central element of any "sensible" human spaceflight program.  Instead, a return to the Moon is a prerequisite to the ultimate goal of sending people to Mars and should be the next step.

Stafford is an iconic presence in the space community.  A former astronaut who flew four space missions -- including commanding the 1975 U.S.-Soviet Apollo-Soyuz Test Project (ASTP) -- he has remained closely involved in the civil space program even as his career took him back to the Air Force and ultimately into retirement.   

In his written statement today to the Subcommittee on Science and Space of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, he noted that a number of studies conducted over many decades are "remarkably consistent" that "[l]eadership in space is, for any society that can aspire to attain it, a key to leadership on Earth and in human society, for all the generations to come."   He led one of those studies during the George H.W. Bush Administration entitled America at the Threshold: America's Space Exploration Initiative.

He asserted that the "choice of destinations has ... already been made for us.  The surface of the Moon is ... our proper next frontier."  He acknowledged that the concept of sending astronauts to an asteroid, whether the original plan announced by President Obama in 2010 or the new idea of directing an asteroid into cis-lunar space, has "inherent scientific interest."   However, it "should not be the central theme of any sensible long-term human spaceflight program.  Such missions are an interesting adjunct to the far more interesting theme of human presence on the Moon" and then Mars.

Stafford also highlighted the importance of international cooperation in pursuing future human spaceflight goals. He has been deeply involved with U.S.-Soviet/Russian space cooperation since ASTP and chairs NASA's International Space Station (ISS) Advisory Committee.  That committee and its Russian counterpart meet regularly to review and identify major issues for the ISS.   At a meeting last year, he told the Senate committee, the Russians shared their long term plan for human spaceflight.  It is based on international cooperation modeled on the ISS partnership, he reported.  "I have said that we should make it the nation's business to lead in space.  We should.  But I have also noted that leaders need partners and allies."

Bill Gerstenmaier, NASA's Associate Administrator for Human Exploration and Operations, and Steve Cook, Director, Space Technologies, at Dynetics, also testified.   Gerstenmaier was very upbeat about the state of the human spaceflight program today and the road ahead, including the asteroid retrieval mission announced in the FY2014 budget request.   Cook represented the commercial space industry and emphasized the need for "stable, long-term space policy and supporting programs" in order for the "commercial space sector to flourish."  In response to a question from subcommittee chairman Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL), Cook said the key is to have a long term plan with associated dates that the private sector can leverage in order to develop business plans and look for ways to be profitable.

A webcast of the hearing and the prepared statements of the witnesses are on the committee's website.

The third time WAS the charm for Orbital Sciences Corporation.   The test launch of its Antares rocket lifted off on schedule at 5:00 pm ET today from Wallops Island, VA.  A post-launch press conference is scheduled for 6:30 pm ET.

Two previous attempts were scrubbed -- one for technical reasons, the other for weather -- but all went well today as Antares inaugurated use of the new Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS) at NASA's Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, VA.

An engineering model of Orbital's Cygnus spacecraft and several small satellites -- called Phonesats -- that hitched a ride on this launch were successfully deployed.

Presidential Science Adviser John Holdren applauded the launch.

Orbital plans the next test launch at the end of June or early July.  An actual Cygnus spacecraft will be aboard that launch and will test the rest of the sequence of rendezvous and berthing with the International Space Station (ISS).   Antares and Cygnus are part of NASA's Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program to develop commercial space transportation systems to take cargo to the ISS.

SpaceX is Orbital's competitor in the COTS program, although NASA already has signed contracts with both companies for operational "Commercial Resupply Services" (CRS) missions to the ISS -- 12 for SpaceX and eight for Orbital.

Will the third time be the charm?   Orbital Sciences Corporation will make a third attempt to launch its new Antares rocket this afternoon, Sunday, April 21.   The weather forecast is 80 percent favorable.

Yesterday's launch attempt was scrubbed because upper level winds exceeded limits.  An earlier attempt, on April 17, was scrubbed because of a technical glitch.  The potential weather issue today is surface level winds.

Once again, the launch window opens at 5:00 pm ET and NASA TV will begin coverage at 4:30 pm ET.  Keep up to date by following @OrbitalSciences and @NASA_Wallops on Twitter.

Antares will launch from the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport (MARS) at NASA's Wallops Flight Facility on Wallops Island, VA.  Orbital released a map showing the large part of the East Coast that might be able to see the launch, weather permitting.

This is a test launch, the first for Antares, which is being developed by Orbital as part of NASA's Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program.

The following events may of be interest in the week ahead, starting today with the rescheduled launch of Antares hopefully around 5:00 pm ET.  The House and Senate both are in session this week.

During the Week

Orbital Sciences Corp. will try again today (Sunday) to launch its new Antares rocket for the first time.  Two previous attempts were scrubbed, the first because of a technical glitch and yesterday because of weather.  The launch window again opens at 5:00 pm ET.  Follow @OrbitalSciences and @NASA_Wallops on Twitter to keep up to date.

That's just the start of a very busy week, with many congressional hearings on NASA, NOAA, FAA and DOD space activities (see our separate list of just those hearings, though one more has arisen since -- the House Appropriations hearing on the FAA budget request on Wednesday, which includes the Office of Commercial Space Transportation).  Among the other highlights are a meeting of the National Research Council's Committee on Human Spaceflight tomorrow and Tuesday and a meeting of the full NASA Advisory Council (NAC) on Wednesday and Thursday (many of the NAC committees met last week and one more will meet on Monday).

CORRECTION:  The SASC hearing on military space programs and DOD use of the spectrum is on April 24, not April 23 as originally shown in this list.  Our apologies for the error.  It is corrected in the revised list below.

Sunday, April 21

• Rescheduled launch of Antares from Wallops Island, VA, launch window opens at 5:00 pm ET

Monday, April 22

• NASA Advisory Council (NAC) Committee on Audit, Finance and Analysis, NASA HQ, Washington, DC, 9:00 am - 4:30 pm ET

Monday-Tuesday, April 22-23

• National Research Council Committee on Human Spaceflight, National Academy of Sciences Bldg, 2100 Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, DC   (The meeting is actually three days, April 22-24, but the afternoon of the 23rd and all of the 24th is closed)

Monday-Thursday, April 22-25

• European Conference on Space Debris, Darmstadt, Germany

Tuesday, April 23

• Senate Commerce Sbcmte Hearing on NOAA (and Coast Guard)  FY2014 Budget Request, 253 Russell, 10:00 am ET
• WSBR Luncheon Featuring Lance Bush, Challenger Center, University Club, 1135 15th St., NW, Washington, DC, 11:30 am - 1:30 pm ET
• Senate Commerce Sbcmte Hearing on Challenges and Opportunities in Human Space Exploration, 253 Russell, 2:30 pm ET

Wednesday, April 24

• House Appropriations Sbcmte Hearing on FAA's FY2014 Budget Request, 2358-A Rayburn, 10:00 am ET
• House Science, Space and Technology Committee Hearing on NASA's FY2014 Budget Request, 2318 Rayburn, 2:00 pm ET
• Senate Armed Services Sbcmte Hearing on Military Space Programs and DOD Use of Spectrum, 222 Russell, 2:30 pm ET

Wednesday-Thursday, April 24-25

• NASA Advisory Council, NASA HQ, Washington, DC

Thursday, April 25

• Senate Appropriations Sbcmte Hearing on NASA's FY2014 Budget Request, 192 Dirksen, 10:00 am ET
• AIAA-NCS/NDIA Luncheon Featuring DOD's Richard McKinney, Lockheed Martin Global Vision Center, Arlington, VA (Crystal City), 11:30 am - 1:30 pm ET
• House Armed Services Scbmte Hearing on National Security Space Programs, 2212 Rayburn, 3:30 pm ET

The Antares launch has been scrubbed again, this time because of upper level winds.

The next launch attempt will be tomorrow, Sunday, April 21, 2013, at 5:00 pm ET.  The weather is forecast to be favorable except possibly for surface level winds.