SpacePolicyOnline.com Latest News
The STS-135 mission has been extended for one day, with landing now scheduled for July 21.
NASA had hoped from the beginning that launch and docking would be nominal and the mission could be lengthened by a day. This will allow the astronauts extra time to stow material on the shuttle to return to Earth. Some of the items are malfunctioning pieces of equipment that NASA would like to get back on Earth to determine what caused the failure.
Today, two of the International Space Station (ISS) astronauts, Ron Garan and Mike Fossum, will conduct a spacewalk to move a failed ammonia pump from its stowed location on the outside the ISS into the space shuttle's cargo bay for return for Earth, for example.
NOAA's budget request for the Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) would be cut again this year if the House CJS appropriations subcommittee recommendations stand.
The subcommittee made its recommendations last week. The full House Appropriations Committee is scheduled to mark up the CJS bill tomorrow. The committee's press release last week sounded like good news for JPSS, saying "an increase of $430 million is included for the Joint Polar Satellite System weather satellite program to ensure the continuation of important weather data collection."
Unfortunately for NOAA, as explained in the draft committee report on the bill that was released today, that is an increase over the amount that it received for the current fiscal year, FY2011, not over the request for FY2012. The subcommittee approved $901 million for JPSS in FY2012, $168 million less than the $1.07 billion request.
JPSS is NOAA's portion of the restructured National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS). As NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenko has pointed out in several congressional hearings, Congress's decision to not fund JPSS at the requested level for FY2011 could mean an 18-month data gap later this decade as NOAA's older satellites cease functioning and there are no new ones to replace them. A reduction in FY2012 presumably could lengthen that gap.
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is proposing to take over the Landsat program from NASA in the FY2012 budget request, but House appropriators are not happy with how the Obama Administration wants to do it.
The House Appropriations Committee's press release last week reporting on the recommendations of its Interior and Environment Subcommittee stated starkly: "The bill also does not provide funding for the President's costly and flawed proposal to transfer the 'LandSat' satellite imaging program from NASA to the USGS."
The draft report to accompany the bill is available on the committee's website and the language there is somewhat softer. "The Committee supports the continuation of the LandSat program beyond LandSat 8 and urges the Administration to submit a fiscal year 2013 budget proposal that does not offset increases for LandSat with decreases elsewhere in the Survey's budget," it says.
NASA is currently building the Landsat Data Continuity Mission (LDCM), which USGS calls Landsat 8. USGS currently operates the two functional satellites in this series, Landsat 5 and Landsat 7, and will operate Landsat 8 once it is launched at the end of next year. It has plans for at least two more follow-on satellites, Landsat 9 and 10, and wants to assume responsibility for the program overall. It would set the requirements for the new satellites and operate them, using NASA as its acquistion agent just as NOAA does now for weather satellites, reimbursing NASA for its costs.
The Administration proposed creating a new account in the USGS budget called National Land Imaging, funded at $99.8 million in FY2012. The subcommittee denied that request and retained funding for Landsat in the "Surveys, Investigations, and Research" account. According to the subcommittee's report, $51.8 million is provided.
The full committee is marking up the bill today.
About 3:00 this afternoon, the House resumed debate on the FY2012 Energy and Water Development appropriations bill (H.R. 2354). One amendment that may come up today would restore funding for the Department of Energy (DOE) to restart production of plutonium-238 (Pu-238), which NASA needs for some of its planetary exploration spacecraft.
Bill Adkins, a principal at the Center for Strategic Space Studies (CS3), tweeted earlier today that a vote is expected on an amendment by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) to restore the $15 million cut by the House Appropriations Committee for Pu-238 production. The committee feels that NASA should pay all the costs associated with that activity instead of splitting the costs between the two agencies as the Obama Administration proposes.
Schiff represents Pasadena, CA, home of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory that builds many of NASA's planetary exploration spacecraft. A shortage of Pu-238 for NASA's probes that travel too far from the Sun or remain on lunar or planetary surfaces for too long to rely on solar energy has been imminent for some time. A 2009 National Research Council report called for immediate action, but Congress has denied the Administration's request for DOE funding for the past two years. It appears ready to do so again.
DOE is the only government agency allowed to possess nuclear material and has built all of NASA's nuclear power sources in the past.
The House Appropriations Committee today released the draft report to accompany the Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS) appropriations bill. The full committee will mark up the bill tomorrow.
Top-level information on how much funding the CJS subcommittee approved was made public last week. This draft report provides additional details and the subcommittee's reasoning for its decisions. Changes could be made at the markup tomorrow.
In the draft report released today, the committee criticizes NASA for its inability to control costs. The committee praises the agency for adopting the new Joint Cost and Schedule Confidence Level (JCL) approach, but complains that it is "undermined by NASA's willingness to make exceptions and allow projects to move forward at lower confidence levels." It "urges" NASA to stop doing that and "strictly hold all projects to the 70 percent standard." At the 70 percent cost confidence level, there is a 70 percent chance that the project will be completed for no more than the associated cost estimate.
At a separate hearing before the House Science, Space and Technology Committee on the new Space Launch System this morning, NASA Administrator Bolden cited his Naval Academy classmate and current Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Michael Mullen, as saying that the state of the U.S. economy is the largest single threat to the nation. Bolden added that NASA must take its share of budget cuts, but must do so "smartly."
If the House Appropriations Committee adopts the recommendations of its CJS subcommittee as expressed in this report, Bolden will have his work cut out for him. The recommendation is to cut NASA's budget by $1.91 billion compared to the President's request for FY2012 ($16.81 billion instead of the $18.72 billion requested), or $1.64 billion compared to its current funding level of $18.45 billion. Proposed cuts to the President's request include the following:
- $100 million from Earth science
- $374 million from the James Webb Space Telescope, which would zero the account
- $40 million from planetary science
- $649 million from space technology
- $300 million from the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate -- this is a net reduction after a committee recommended increase for the Space Launch System and Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and a reduction from commercial crew
- $283 million from the Space Operations Mission Directorate, of which $60 million is provided in the Construction and Environmental Compliance and Restoration account instead for activities that are part of the 21st Century Launch Complex effort. The committee would cut $117 million from the space shuttle program. It says the remaining funds, $548 million, should be enough to cover NASA's liability for the pension plan for shuttle workers.
- $142 million from Cross Agency Support
- $26 million from Construction and Environmental Compliance and Restoration -- a net reduction after the committee's movement of $60 million to this account from Space Operations
- $1 million from the Office of Inspector General (IG), although it directs ESMD to use $1 million of its funds for a study on the future of the human exploration program to be conducted by the IG office
The committee would provide NASA with additional flexibility on how to manage the cuts by not specifying the amounts of funding for each of NASA's projects and activities. Instead, it specifies amounts at the theme level, allowing NASA to decide how to spend the funds within that theme.
For a table comparing the President's request with what the committee is recommending, read our fact sheet on NASA's FY2012 budget request.
UPDATE: This has been updated with the current status of the orbital debris issue.
Space shuttle Atlantis successfully docked with the International Space Station (ISS) today.
The STS-135 crew docked with ISS at 11:07 am EDT. Their mission is delivering supplies and equipment to the ISS to ensure that it could operate for as long as a year without supplies that are intended to be taken to the ISS by two companies, SpaceX and Orbital Sciences Corp., under NASA's "commercial cargo" program. SpaceX has had two successful test launches of its Falcon 9 launch vehicle, one of which also successfully tested its Dragon spacecraft. Orbital has yet to make its first flight of the Taurus 2 launch vehicle or its Cygnus spacecraft. NASA is hoping that both companies will be ready for operational flights to ISS early in 2012.
Meanwhile, on Sunday there was concerned that STS-135 and the ISS might have to dodge a piece of orbital debris on Tuesday. According to NASA, U.S. Strategic Command was tracking a piece of debris from a Russian satellite, Cosmos 375, that might come close to the orbiting facility about noon that day and require a thruster burn to move out of the way. Cosmos 375, launched in 1970, was one of the first satellites launched as part of the Soviet co-orbital antisatellite (ASAT) program.
On Monday, however, NASA's Bob Jacobs tweeted that it had been determined the debris did not pose a threat.
Researchers wanting to focus on the origin-of-life question now have the opportunity to compete for up to $2 million in research funding. But there is a twist: proposals must not include the intervention of an intelligent creator. For Harry Lonsdale, the millionaire chemist offering the award, the research should help prove -- once and for all -- that life is solely the result of physical and chemical processes.
According to AAAS's Scienceinsider, the award is driven by Lonsdale's belief that "the creation of life was probably not an act of God. It was just nature running its course." Lonsdale argues that science has achieved progress toward answering this question and that an answer will soon be available: "The answer will be: God didn't do it, nature did it."
Lonsdale's website announcing the award details strict guidelines for proposals to consider the question of how life originated on prebiotic Earth, encouraging participants to "offer unconventional hypotheses that nonetheless can be subject to experimental validation." This includes a definition of life itself: "'Life' is defined here as a self-sustained chemical system capable of undergoing Darwinian evolution."
Including a definition is a surprise in itself. NASA's Astrobiology program, which adopts an interdisciplinary research approach to consider many of these questions in its quest for life elsewhere, is careful not to provide a definition of life. With discoveries such as extreme life questioning old assumptions about what life is supposed to be, researchers may not want to exclude extraordinary, yet scientifically sound, propositions. Still, there may be a synergy between the two initiatives as one of the experts helping evaluating submissions, according to ScienceInsider, is NASA Astrobiologist Chris McKay.
Lonsdale states on his website that "A solution will give every science teacher in the world, from high school to college, a fundamental understanding of how life probably began on the Earth." It may be safe to add that new findings may also impact NASA activities and our understanding of where life may exist beyond our own planet.
The following events may be of interest in the coming week. For more information, see our calendar on the right menu or click the links below. The House and Senate both are in session this week.
During the Week
Two key events on the Hill are expected this week for NASA. On Tuesday, the House Science, Space and Technology Committee will hold a hearing on the Space Launch System that Congress directed NASA to build in the 2010 NASA Authorization Act. Recent rumors were that NASA would announce the design of the system before the final launch of the space shuttle, but the launch came and went with no announcement. On Wednesday, the full House Appropriations Committee will mark up the FY2012 Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS) appropriations bill and agree or not with the recommendations of its CJS subcommittee. Those recommendations include a substantial cut to NASA's FY2012 budget request and termination of the James Webb Space Telescope.
The full House Appropriations Committee will mark up the Interior-Environment appropriations bill on Tuesday. It will have to agree or not with the recommendations from the Interior-Environment subcommittee, which include denying the funding requested by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to take over the Landsat program from NASA.
Tuesday, July 12
Wednesday, July 13
- House Appropriations Committee mark up of the FY2012 Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS) appropriations bill (includes NASA and NOAA), 2359 Rayburn, 10:00 am EDT
Wednesday-Thursday, July 13-14
Friday, July 15
While many of us were focused on the space shuttle launch on Friday, the House passed the FY2012 defense appropriations bill (H.R. 2219) and began consideration of the energy and water appropriations bill (H.R. 2354).
No amendments were adopted during consideration of the defense bill that would directly affect military space activities. As reported from the House Appropriations Committee, the Defense Weather Satellite System (DWSS) -- DOD's portion of the former National Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS) -- was cut in half and several other programs were cut, too. Their fate is now in the hands of the Senate, which has not yet marked up its version of the bill.
As for the energy and water bill, as reported from the House Appropriations Committee, it denies the request for Department of Energy (DOE) funding to restart production of plutonium-238, which is needed for some of NASA's deep space and lunar probes. In the FY2012 request, DOE and NASA would split the costs, but the appropriations committee is not convinced that DOE should pay for any of it since NASA is the agency that benefits from the Pu-238.
The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) issued a statement following the final launch of the space shuttle program asserting that it did not signal the end of NASA or the end of U.S. aerospace leadership.
The statement from AIAA's Public Policy Committee says in part:
"The launch of space shuttle Atlantis on 8 July closes an important epoch in American science, but does not signal the end of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA]. Nor, does the launch of Atlantis signal the end of American leadership in aerospace. Today, the United States is better positioned to continue leading the world in space exploration, understanding our planet's environment, and making discoveries which benefit all of humankind. Just as in aviation, where in one hundred years we have seen the creation of hundreds of thousands jobs in small and large businesses across America selling products globally, in the next fifty years we will see the same in the field of space exploration."
AIAA Executive Director Bob Dickman acknowledged in a separate statement that the Atlantis launch evokes "mixed feelings," but that "we recognize the promise of a bright future in which industry and commerce will play a greater role as we work together to build on the shuttle's legacy engineering and science achievements."
Events of Interest
Subscribe to Email Updates: